Deep Layer Security Advisory
Cloud SecurityProgram Development4 – 7 Weeks

Cloud Detection Engineering

Cloud-Native Detection Library for Cloud-Specific Attacks with MITRE ATT&CK Mapping and Analyst Runbooks

Generic SIEM rules written for on-premises environments do not detect cloud-specific attacks. Credential theft via metadata services, IAM privilege escalation through policy manipulation, lateral movement via role assumption chains, persistence through backdoor identity providers, and data exfiltration through cloud-native services — these attack techniques have no equivalent in traditional environments, and your existing detection library does not cover them.

This engagement builds a cloud-native detection library tailored to your specific cloud environments, services, and threat profile. Every detection rule is mapped to MITRE ATT&CK for Cloud and paired with an analyst runbook that provides investigation steps, context enrichment queries, and response actions. The rules are designed for your actual environment — not generic templates that generate false positives on day one.

The approach addresses alert fatigue directly: rules are tuned against your baseline before deployment, severity is calibrated to your environment context, and every rule includes a documented false positive profile. Coverage spans AWS, Azure, and GCP with detections for the attack techniques that matter in cloud environments.

MITRE ATT&CK for Cloud (IaaS, SaaS, Containers)MITRE ATT&CK for ContainersNIST CSF 2.0 (Detect function)CIS Controls v8 (Audit Log Management, Security Monitoring)

Who This Is For

Ideal clients for this engagement.

Organizations whose SOC has limited cloud detection capability despite significant cloud workloads
Companies that have deployed cloud SIEM rules but suffer from alert fatigue due to generic, untuned detections
Enterprises with a detection engineering function that wants to extend coverage to cloud-specific attack techniques
Organizations that have had cloud security incidents and want to build detection for the techniques used against them

The Problem

What this engagement addresses.

Generic Rules, Cloud-Specific Attacks

On-premises SIEM rules cannot detect cloud-native attack techniques. IAM privilege escalation, role chaining, metadata service abuse, and cloud-native persistence mechanisms require purpose-built detections that most organizations do not have.

Alert Fatigue from Untuned Rules

Cloud security vendors provide hundreds of out-of-box rules. Without environment-specific tuning, these rules generate a flood of alerts — most benign — that overwhelm analysts and bury real attacks in noise. Alert fatigue is the number one reason cloud attacks go undetected.

No Analyst Context for Cloud Alerts

When a cloud detection fires, analysts often lack the context to investigate it. They do not know what the alert means in cloud context, what to look at next, or how to determine if it is a true positive. Without runbooks, cloud alerts sit in queues until they age out.

Coverage Gaps in High-Impact Techniques

The most impactful cloud attack techniques — IAM escalation, cross-account lateral movement, identity provider backdoors, data exfiltration via cloud services — are precisely the techniques with the least detection coverage in most environments.

Deliverables

What you receive.

01

Cloud Detection Library

Production-ready detection rules covering cloud-specific attack techniques: credential theft, IAM escalation, lateral movement, persistence, and data exfiltration. Each rule includes detection logic, MITRE ATT&CK mapping, severity, confidence level, and false positive profile.

02

Analyst Runbooks

Investigation runbook paired with every detection rule. Each runbook covers alert context, investigation steps, enrichment queries, true/false positive determination criteria, and recommended response actions. Written for analysts with varying cloud expertise.

03

MITRE ATT&CK Coverage Map

Visual and tabular mapping of detection coverage against MITRE ATT&CK for Cloud. Shows covered techniques, detection confidence per technique, and remaining coverage gaps for future development.

04

Detection Engineering Playbook

Operational guide for maintaining and extending the detection library: rule development lifecycle, testing methodology, tuning procedures, and metrics for detection program health.

Methodology

How the engagement works.

1

Threat Profiling & Baseline

Weeks 1 – 2

  • Cloud environment inventory and architecture review
  • Threat profile development based on cloud services, industry, and attack surface
  • Current detection coverage assessment and gap analysis
  • Log source inventory and telemetry coverage validation
  • Baseline traffic and behavior profiling for tuning
2

Detection Development

Weeks 2 – 5

  • Detection rule development for prioritized attack techniques
  • MITRE ATT&CK for Cloud mapping
  • Analyst runbook development per detection rule
  • Environment-specific tuning and false positive suppression
  • Detection testing against simulated attack scenarios
3

Deployment & Validation

Weeks 5 – 6

  • Detection rule deployment to SIEM/detection platform
  • Monitoring period for false positive validation
  • Severity and confidence calibration based on live data
  • MITRE ATT&CK coverage map finalization
4

Handoff & Operationalization

Weeks 6 – 7

  • Detection engineering playbook delivery
  • Knowledge transfer to SOC and detection engineering teams
  • Runbook walkthrough and analyst training
  • Detection program metrics and improvement roadmap

Engagement Tiers

Scoped to your architecture.

Focused

Single cloud provider (AWS, Azure, or GCP). Core detection coverage for top 15-20 cloud attack techniques. Analyst runbooks for all detections.

  • 15-20 cloud-native detection rules
  • Analyst runbooks for all rules
  • MITRE ATT&CK coverage map
  • Environment-specific tuning
  • Detection engineering playbook

Standard

Up to 2 cloud providers. Extended detection coverage for 30-40 attack techniques including cross-cloud lateral movement. Full analyst runbooks and operational playbook.

  • Everything in Focused
  • 30-40 detection rules across 2 providers
  • Cross-cloud lateral movement detections
  • Advanced persistence and data exfiltration detections
  • Detection testing with simulated attacks

Complex

Multi-cloud (AWS + Azure + GCP). 50+ detection rules with advanced techniques, cross-cloud correlation, and Kubernetes-specific detections.

  • Everything in Standard
  • 50+ detection rules across all providers
  • Cross-cloud correlation rules
  • Kubernetes threat detection
  • Custom detection development for organization-specific attack surface

Prerequisites

  • SIEM or detection platform with cloud log ingestion configured
  • Cloud audit logs enabled (CloudTrail, Activity Log, Audit Log)
  • Read-only access to cloud environments for baseline profiling
  • SOC or security team available for runbook validation and knowledge transfer

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions.

Which SIEM or detection platforms do you support?

We develop detection rules in a platform-agnostic format (Sigma where applicable) and then translate to your specific platform. We have direct experience with Splunk, Microsoft Sentinel, Google Chronicle/SecOps, Elastic Security, CrowdStrike Falcon LogScale, Sumo Logic, and AWS Security Hub/GuardDuty custom rules.

How do you address alert fatigue if we already have too many cloud alerts?

We start by assessing your existing cloud detection rules — identifying which are generating value and which are contributing to fatigue. Existing rules are tuned or retired as part of the engagement. New rules are baselined against your environment before deployment, with documented false positive profiles and calibrated severity. The result is fewer, more accurate alerts — not more alerts on top of existing noise.

Do we need a dedicated detection engineering team to maintain these rules?

Not necessarily. The detection engineering playbook covers maintenance procedures for SOC teams without dedicated detection engineers. Rules are designed for stability — they detect technique patterns, not ephemeral IOCs. That said, extending the library with new detections does benefit from detection engineering skills, and the playbook includes a development lifecycle for teams ready to build that capability.

Related Offerings

Often paired with this engagement.

Cloud Security Posture Assessment

Identifies the security gaps and misconfigurations that cloud detection rules monitor for. Assessment findings inform detection prioritization.

Cloud Security Remediation

Fixes the misconfigurations that detections alert on — reducing alert volume by fixing the root cause rather than just detecting the symptom.

Cloud IAM Architecture

IAM architecture design that reduces the attack surface for IAM escalation and credential-based attacks that detection rules monitor.

Ready to discuss this engagement?

30-minute discovery call. We will discuss your application architecture, your specific concerns, and whether this assessment is the right fit.