Deep Layer Security Advisory

Application Security

Security that works with engineering, not against it.

Application security fails when it is bolted on late, enforced without context, or designed without understanding how developers actually work. Security gates that block deployments without clear remediation paths create adversarial relationships. Vulnerability backlogs that grow faster than remediation erode trust in the program. Generic secure coding standards that developers cannot apply to their actual stack get ignored.

Deep Layer designs AppSec programs with an adoption-first philosophy. Secure SDLC integrated into existing workflows. Pipeline security with calibration-before-enforcement — rulesets tuned against your actual codebase before blocking is enabled. Standards written with code examples in your languages. Findings delivered in pull requests, not PDFs.

OWASPNIST 800-53CIS Controls v8PCI DSS 4.0SOC 2NIST SSDFSLSA

Challenges We Address

The problems that bring clients to us.

Security Bolted On Late

Security review happens after development is complete. Findings require architectural changes that are too expensive to fix late in the cycle.

Pipeline Without Security Gates

CI/CD deploys code to production with no secrets detection, no SAST, no dependency scanning, and no container image verification.

Vulnerability Backlog Growth

Scanners produce findings faster than engineering can remediate. No risk-based prioritization. No SLA governance. The backlog becomes noise.

Standards Without Code Examples

Secure coding standards written in abstract security language. Developers cannot translate generic OWASP guidance into their framework and language.

SaaS Security Questions

Customer security questionnaires require evidence of AppSec practices that do not exist. No SBOM, no pen test reports, no SDLC documentation.

Ideal Clients

Who this is built for.

Development teams scaling without dedicated application security and needing a program foundation
Companies with CI/CD pipelines that have no security scanning, gating, or SBOM generation
Organizations with vulnerability backlogs growing faster than remediation capacity
SaaS vendors facing customer security questionnaires and needing demonstrable AppSec practices
Engineering leaders who want security integrated into development workflows, not imposed from outside

Service Offerings

What we deliver.

AppSec Program Design

Program Development

Complete application security program — Secure SDLC framework, pipeline security architecture, coding standards, developer enablement, governance model, and threat modeling toolkit.

Secure SDLC with security gates per development phase
Pipeline security tooling architecture
Secure coding standards for 2-3 primary languages (with code examples)
API security standards aligned to OWASP API Top 10
Security champions program model
Governance model with RACI and KPIs
Developer enablement materials
Threat modeling toolkit (STRIDE/PASTA)

Secure SDLC Program Build

Program Development

Implement a Secure SDLC across your development organization — security requirements, design review, code review, testing, and release verification integrated into existing workflows.

SDLC security integration points
Security requirements framework
Design review process and checklist
Security code review guidelines
Pre-release security verification checklist

Pipeline Security Implementation

Implementation

Embed security controls into CI/CD — secrets detection, SAST, SCA, container scanning, IaC security, and SBOM generation with calibration before enforcement.

Pre-commit secrets detection
SAST and SCA scanning integration
Container image scanning and base image policy
IaC security scanning
SBOM generation
Security gate policy with exception process
Codebase-calibrated rulesets (no default templates)
Developer walkthrough and documentation

Penetration Testing (Web / Mobile / API)

Assessment

Application penetration testing covering OWASP Top 10 and API Top 10 — scoping, execution, findings with reproduction steps, and remediation guidance.

Scope definition and rules of engagement
OWASP Top 10 / API Top 10 coverage
Authentication and authorization testing
Business logic testing
Findings with reproduction steps
Remediation guidance and retesting

SaaS Application Security Assessment

Assessment

Security evaluation of SaaS applications — multi-tenancy isolation, API security, data protection, authentication architecture, and compliance mapping.

Multi-tenancy isolation review
API security assessment
Authentication and session management review
Data protection evaluation
Compliance mapping (SOC 2, ISO 27001)

Software Supply Chain Security

Program Development

Governance program for the dependencies, suppliers, and build artifacts your software relies on — dependency risk policy, SBOM program, supplier assessment framework, and SLSA alignment roadmap.

Dependency risk policy and inventory
SBOM program (generation, distribution, consumption workflow)
Supplier security assessment framework with tiered assessments
SLSA alignment roadmap
Software transparency package (CISA attestation, SBOM delivery)
30-day post-handoff support

Penetration Testing

Assessment

Adversary-perspective testing of applications, infrastructure, and cloud environments — every Critical/High finding is actually exploited, not assumed. Includes attacker narrative and remediation retest.

External network, web app, API, cloud, or internal/assumed breach testing
Technical findings report with CVSS scores and ATT&CK mapping
Executive summary for board/CISO audiences
Attacker narrative mapping detection gaps
Reproduction steps for every finding
Remediation retest within 90 days (included)

API Security Assessment

Assessment

Manual API security assessment identifying authorization failures, data exposure, and business logic flaws that automated scanners miss — OWASP API Security Top 10 coverage with proof-of-concept requests.

BOLA/IDOR and authorization model review
Authentication and JWT/OAuth security testing
Mass assignment and excessive data exposure testing
Business logic flaw analysis
Technical findings with complete request/response pairs
Authorization model review (systemic vs. point issues)
Remediation retest within 90 days (included)

Secure Code Review

Assessment

Manual security review of application source code — injection flaws, auth weaknesses, authorization bypasses, cryptographic errors, and logic issues identified at the file, function, and line number level.

Manual review of security-sensitive functions
Findings with CWE classification and specific line numbers
Vulnerable code snippets with corrected code examples
Data flow analysis for complex vulnerabilities
SAST configuration recommendations for pipeline integration
IaC security review (Terraform, CloudFormation, Bicep)
Remediation retest within 90 days (included)

Threat Modeling Workshops

Design & Architecture

Structured threat models for in-scope systems — facilitated workshops producing data flow diagrams, STRIDE threat analysis, security requirements, and prioritized controls before code is written.

2-3 facilitated workshop sessions (2-3 hours each)
Annotated data flow diagrams with trust boundaries
STRIDE threat analysis with risk ratings
Security requirements backlog (Jira/Linear/GitHub-ready)
MITRE ATT&CK threat mapping for detection gaps
Facilitator guide for future self-run sessions

Developer Security Training

Implementation

Hands-on secure coding training calibrated to your team's specific language stack and framework — not generic OWASP slides. Practical exercises, quick reference cards, and materials you own.

Pre-training scoping and stack assessment
Customized training materials (4-5 modules)
Hands-on exercises in your team's languages
Quick reference cards per module
Training completion records for compliance
Materials delivered for internal reuse and onboarding

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions.

Do you perform the penetration testing or coordinate it?

Both. Deep Layer performs web, mobile, and API penetration testing directly. For specialized testing (hardware, wireless, physical), we scope and coordinate with vetted specialists.

What languages and frameworks do you write secure coding standards for?

Standards are tailored to your stack. Common languages include TypeScript/JavaScript, Python, Go, Java, C#, and Rust. Standards include framework-specific examples (React, Django, Spring, .NET, etc.).

How do you prevent DevSecOps from slowing down development?

Calibration before enforcement. Rulesets are tuned against your actual codebase before blocking is enabled. A notification period lets developers see findings without being blocked. Only after tuning and baseline are established do gates become enforcing.

What is the difference between a penetration test and a secure code review?

A penetration test finds vulnerabilities from the outside — what an attacker can exploit over the network. A secure code review finds vulnerabilities at the source code level — implementation errors invisible to external testing, like hardcoded credentials, cryptographic misuse, or authorization logic bypasses. They are complementary.

What does Software Supply Chain Security cover that DevSecOps does not?

DevSecOps embeds scanning into your CI/CD pipeline. Supply chain security addresses the governance layer — dependency risk policies, SBOM programs, supplier security assessments, SLSA build provenance, and software transparency packages for customers and regulators.

Ready to discuss application security?

30-minute discovery call. We will discuss your environment, your challenges, and whether there is a fit — no sales pitch.